This introduces a pleasingly rational point of view.
What do you think about adding some more pics? I dont want to offend anyone, blog is really nice. Just as I know visitors acquire info much more effective when there are certain useful pictures.
Even if there are â€œsome mutual fund managers who can beat the indexes and can more than cover their costsâ€ there is no way, when looking to the future, to distinguish between such managers and the next Long Term Capital Management.…including Buffett himself. Even if he genuinely beat the market in the past, by something more than luck, he could lose that ability tomorrow. Heck, he could have lost it 6 months ago and there just hasn’t been enough data to see it yet.
This article keeps it real, no doubt.
| le 25 mars 2008 Ã 12:38|Si l’on ouvre l’article, on trouve ce titre:« Claude Perdriel annonce cÃ¨de les rÃªnes opÃ©rationnelles du « Nouvel Observateur » Ã Denis Olivennes »Et en bas de page:« Le marchÃ© de la titrisation est en bisse de 25% »Tout s’explique !
I could watch Schindler's List and still be happy after reading this.
These topics are so confusing but this helped me get the job done.
Great insight. Relieved I'm on the same side as you.
I can’t stand most gardening books. Plant the seeds, walk away, and the come back and pick peas and lettuce and tomatoes all at the same time! It’s garden as grocery store!As for anti-bias, we like All The World by Liz Garton Scanlon and Marla Frazee, blogged about . Plus it comes with entitled “Homosexual agenda obvious. . .”
Thinking like that shows an expert's touch